WSJ Slams Robert Mueller’s Investigation

Robert Mueller

The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board went after Special Counsel Robert Mueller, hard.

The Murdoch-owned newspaper posted an editorial calling for Mueller’s team to investigate wiretapping allegations involving former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort.

The op-ed says that Mueller’s ties to James Comey “make him too conflicted” to conduct an honest investigation.

“Congress is charged with providing oversight of law enforcement and the FISA courts, and it has an obligation to investigate their role in 2016. The intelligence committees have subpoena authority and the ability to hold those who don’t cooperate in contempt.”

The WSJ writes that Comey’s “maneuvering to get Mr. Mueller appointed, and his leaks to the press, have shown that Mr. Comey is as political and self-serving as anyone in Washington. No investigation into Russia’s role in the 2016 campaign will be credible or complete without the facts about all Mr. Comey’s wiretaps.”

WSJ Excerpt

CNN reported Monday that the FBI obtained a warrant last year to eavesdrop on Paul Manafort, Mr. Trump’s campaign manager from May to August in 2016. The story claims the FBI first wiretapped Mr. Manafort in 2014 while investigating his work as a lobbyist for Ukraine’s ruling party. That warrant lapsed, but the FBI convinced the court that administers the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to issue a second order as part of its probe into Russian meddling in the election.

Guess who has lived in a condo in Trump Tower since 2006? Paul Manafort.

The story suggests the monitoring started in the summer or fall, and extended into early this year. While Mr. Manafort resigned from the campaign in August, he continued to speak with Candidate Trump. It is thus highly likely that the FBI was listening to the political and election-related conversations of a leading contender for the White House. That’s extraordinary—and worrisome.

Mr. Comey told Congress in late March that he “had no information that supports those [Trump] tweets.” Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper was even more specific that “there was no such wiretap activity mounted against—the President-elect at the time, or as a candidate, or against his campaign.” He denied that any such FISA order existed. Were they lying?


  1. When everything is a “coincidence”, then nothing is a coincidence.

    The D.C. Establishment was spying on the Trump campaign.
    They’re probably still spying on his administration now.

    Lots of people are pointing fingers at the obama administration, but presidents these days are just sock puppets who do what they’re told.

    And if they aren’t sock puppets, they get railroaded like Trump is.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here